Eleven months ago on June 22, 2010 we had launched the “Save Wellington Street” campaign and this website, along with a twitter account and a facebook page.
We want to thank wholeheartedly everyone who has been supportive of the campaign and our position to advocate in favor of safeguarding the name of Wellington Street downtown Ottawa.
To mark the anniversary and because there’s been much talk about the “Commemorative Naming Policy” lately, we thought we would take a look at the policy’s key points:
1- A commemorative name honours individuals who have: demonstrated excellence, courage or exceptional service to the citizens of the City of Ottawa, Province of Ontario and/or Canada; provided extensive community service; worked to foster equality and reduce discrimination; made a significant financial contribution to a park or facility, and the contribution significantly benefits the community that the park or facility serves or who has historical significant to the community, City of Ottawa, Province of Ontario and/or Canada.
2- Any member of the public or City Council may submit a name to the City for consideration.
3- As part of the process, a preliminary investigation of the commemorative name will be conducted to ensure the name has not been used in the past and that the nomination is meritorious.
4- If the Commemorative Naming Committee approves the application, it will then be subjected to a 60-day public consultation phase to ensure there is community support for the proposal.
5- Following the consultation process, the Commemorative Naming Committee – consisting of applicable departmental City staff, the Mayor or his/her designate and the Ward Councillor – will be reconvened to consider the comments received.
6- If there is majority public support for the proposal – the Committee will make a recommendation to the applicable standing committee and City Council to proceed with the application.
In our opinion, this is how the proposal to rename the downtown section of Wellington Street in front of Parliament Hill to Sir John A. Macdonald would score against the six criteria above:
- Sir John A. Macdonald was certainly an historic figure, this is not a point of debate. As an organization who owes half of its name to Sir John A., we are not opposed to more commemorations of Macdonald, we are opposed to the flagrant case of historic amnesia that has been witnessed at city hall in the last eleven months (#1).
- Neither Bob Plamondon (the sole proponent of the renaming) nor Councillor Peter Hume (sponsor of the initiative inside city hall) have submitted an application for the name to be considered. For an application to be submitted, an affidavit needs to be signed, etc. (#2)
- If an “preliminary investigation of the commemorative name” was undertaken, it would become obvious very quickly that although the nomination is meritorious, the name of Macdonald is already in use, and has been since the 1870s. Indeed, as pointed out several times across this website, there exists already a MacDonald Street (notwithstanding the spelling mistake) which is located in the proximity of City Hall and also happens to be parallel to Cartier Street (#3).
Macdonald and Cartier were the leading Fathers of Confederation in the years leading to 1867 and they belong together, like twins. Their street being parallel and remaining so makes sense.
- In the worst-case scenario by which the committee would blindly agree to consider the renaming of Ottawa’s oldest street, there would still be a mandatory public consultation for 60-days (#4).
- The current proposal does not have the support of Jim Watson (Mayor) and Diane Holmes (Ward Councillor) is on record for being one of the 4 who voted against the consultations back in July 2010. She was friendly of our case. The departmental City staff would have the third vote on the Commemorative Naming Committee (#5).
- And it does not have majority public support for the proposal (#6).
We hope that the above criteria and our interpretations of the policy were helpful.
If you wish to read the policy yourself or contact the city with question, you should visit the city’s website here. As per the explanation on the city’s website, this policy dates back to July 2002.
If you are curious about how the discussion happened back in 2002, well we retrieved for you the original report prepared and submitted by Kent Kirkpatrick to the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee in July 2002.